If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Where a producer, importer or seller who violates the Forestry and Mountain Villages Development Promotion Act intends to distribute or sell special forest products through customs, he/she shall indicate the result of quality inspection on the position easily recognizable to consumers;

However, from February 13, 2014 to February 4, 2015, the Defendant sold china, which is a special management forest product, to many unspecified customers, at the “E” plant center located in Cheongju-si Office D, the Defendant did not indicate the result of the quality inspection on the packaging box.

2. He/she shall not make a false indication of the place of origin in violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products or make a false indication of the place of origin that may cause confusion therewith;

However, from February 13, 2014 to February 4, 2015, the Defendant sold cryp from the above E plant center to the above E plant center, and sold cryp cultivated cryp cultivated in the original literature Eup to many unspecified customers, and in the plant center, the Defendant committed an act of falsely marking the country of origin or making an indication likely to cause confusion by attaching the F’s banner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Business registration certificate (E vegetation), transaction specification statement, card sales statement, and I Internet block contents [Judgment of defense counsel's assertion of defense counsel] The defense counsel, not the defendant, delivered the luge to I's "I" operated by the defendant.

G has affixed a banner as stated in its reasoning with the intent to advertise his/her own mountain farm, and thus, the Defendant placed an indication of origin on the mountain 3 of his/her own sale.

I asserts that it cannot be seen.

However, the following circumstances revealed through the aforementioned evidence, i.e., the Defendant, from July 2013 to July 4, 2013, using the trade name “I” in Cheongju-si as materials.