However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on March 29, 2005. A

At around 23:00 on February 13, 2014, the Defendant parked in the Kimpo-si ecological park in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and passed it with the above B and once, within the DK5 car size owned by B.

B. On February 23, 2014, around 23:00, the Defendant sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourse once with B at the same place as above.

C. On April 2014, the Defendant, who was sexual intercourses with B at the same place as above, was sexual intercourses with B.

2. Defendant B, even though he was aware that he was a spouse of the above A, had sexual intercourses with A three times with each other at the same time and place as the above in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the marriage relation certificate and the Acts and subordinate statutes of the institute of divorce lawsuit;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: The latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Code

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act