Seized evidence1 through 5 shall be confiscated from the accused.

피고인은 중국에 있는 성명불상자로부터 제안을 받고 오토바이 택배를 통하여 다른 사람 명의의 체크카드를 전달받은 후, 위 성명불상자가 모바일 채팅 서비스 ‘위챗’을 통하여 알려주는 주민등록번호, 계좌번호, 비밀번호 등을 위 체크카드가 들어있는 박스 겉면에 적어 보관하다가, 지시에 따라 성명불상의 조선족에게 전달하고 그 대가로 박스 1개당 5만원, 체크카드 1개당 15만 원을 받기로 하였다.

Except as otherwise provided for in other Acts, no person shall borrow or lend a means of access, or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access with the knowledge that the means of access is to be used for a crime or to be used for a crime.

Nevertheless, at around 19:45 on July 1, 2015, the Defendant received at least three copies, including a sum of D’s e-mail card (credit card number: E), a national bank check in F’s name, and a sum of H’s e-mail card (G), from the 9th floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building.

Accordingly, the defendant kept the means of access knowing that they will be used in the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. 피의자와 공범간의 위쳇 대화내용 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of keeping access media);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act is deemed to have been kept with the means of access, even though it was aware that the means of access would be used for the crime, and the crime of this case is not suitable for the nature of the crime by taking charge of a part of a systematic and planned intelligent crime.

However, the defendant has been led to confession and is in depth against himself.