beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.25 2018고합96

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a worker on duty working at a hotel construction site B (hereinafter “instant site”) at a female time, and the victim C (52 years) is a team leader managing daily workers at the instant site.

1. On April 16, 2018, the Defendant, at around 10:10 on April 16, 2018, tried to enter the site where he had worked again before the entrance to the instant site, while drinking alcohol again. At the time, the Defendant was out of the site where he had been working due to material shortage, etc. while working, and entered the site again. However, the Defendant appears to have been dissatisfied with the victim’s instructions and horses.

The victim entered the victim's her only, and the victim's her part of the victim's her part in his/her hand was 1 time to her part of the victim's her part and her part was 3 times to her part of the left face of the victim, and suffered about 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim, such as damage to the her head's her part and other parts that require approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

2. On April 17, 2018, the Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defluence, etc.) received the case from the police regarding the crime of the above paragraph (1) from the victim who was asked to appear at the police station, and was willing to take a retaliation against the victim with respect to his or her honor.

On April 17, 2018, from around 10:41 to around 11:35, the Defendant made three calls from the victim to “from around 11:41, the Defendant came to talk with the victim by making it possible for the victim to talk with the victim.” On the same day, around 11:45, the Defendant took the attitude of knife (30 cm in total length, 18 cm in length) a dangerous object prepared in advance for the victim waiting for the Defendant before the entrance to the instant site.

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of proviso of investigation and statement in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness C, D,.