2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, and that there is no record of punishment other than sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 as a violation of the Civil Procedure Act in 2001.

However, although the crime of this case did not have concluded a real estate lease contract with H with the real estate lease deposit of KRW 50 million, the crime of this case is a case in which H forged the real estate lease contract and written consent, and deliver them to the victim and defrauds the victim of KRW 20 million from the victim. Since the method of crime is planned and intelligent, the defendant is not subject to any specific material about the recovery of damage caused by the victim, the victim does not submit any specific material about the recovery of damage caused by the victim, and there is no special change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no change in the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime was committed, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is excessively unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.