When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Larceny;

A. On March 2016, the Defendant 100,000 won in cash on the part of the victim, using a gap in the victim’s surveillance negligence, where the victim gets fright together with the victim, while drinking alcohol as the victim in his/her residence in Yasan-si B and C, North Korea-do, and C.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

B. On April 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected at the places indicated in the said paragraph; (b) cut off the victim’s 1 bom of rice equivalent to 40,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

(c)

On June 6, 2016, the Defendant 1: (a) performed drinking with the victim in the residence of the victim of the Da apartment house in the Donsan-si, Yasan-do, Yasan-do; (b) performed drinking together with the victim; and (c) performed the house of the victim; and (d) performed fluoring tobacco equivalent to 30,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession, which was kept in the west in the west by using the cre

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. Special intimidation: (a) on April 2016, 2016, the Defendant stolen the rice owned by the victim as described in paragraph (a), and (b) on the place indicated in paragraph (1) of 1; (b) the victim, who became aware of such fact, resisted the Defendant; (c) Gaving the rice owned by the victim into the ward; (d) cutting the knife, knife the knife, which is a dangerous object; and (e) threatening the victim, with the knife and knife the knife of the victim; and (e) threatening the victim, who wants to flee from the electric wheelchairs, with the knife, which is a dangerous object.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Articles 329 (a thief) and 284 (a) (a special intimidation) and 283 (1) (a special intimidation) of the Criminal Act regarding facts constituting an offense under the corresponding provision of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for each crime (a fact that the military of proof of alcoholic content of the accused has caused a crime, the fact that the military of proof of alcoholic content of the accused has made efforts for treatment at present, and the victim has been punished for the accused.