However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

1. Defendant A was a spouse who completed a marriage report with Gyeyang-gu on December 24, 2002, but, around September 14, 2013, Defendant A followed the above B with each other on seven occasions in total at the 18th of the same month, around the same month, around the 21st of the same month, around the 23th of the same month, around the same month, around the 30th of the same month, around the same month, around the 30th of the same month, around the 30th of the same month, around the 10th of October of the same year, in a mutual incompetur near Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, the said Defendant B did not have a total of seven times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: the latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;