2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had the same record as the Defendant; (b) the period, frequency, and amount of the instant crime committed by the Defendant, in light of the period, fraud, and the amount of the instant crime committed by the Defendant, the method of committing the crime of forgery of a document is not easy; (c) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflect it; (d) the victims did not wish to punish the Defendant any longer; and (e) the Defendant was detained for about two months as the instant case was detained for the two-month period; and (e) the details and details of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, occupation, etc., as a whole, the sentence of the lower judgment that rendered probation and community service order for 200 hours at the suspension of the execution of imprisonment is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.