However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:50 on June 7, 2015, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, abused “C” in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, where the victim D (the victim D (the victim D) satise and satise and satise and satise satise at a stage, thereby obstructing the victim’s hands and satising the victim’s hand, and sat down the victim’s hand several times, and then, the Defendant, upon completion of the calculation, abused the victim’s eye by drinking the victim’s eye, satisfe the victim’s face, and satisfe the victim’s face with his arms.

As such, the Defendant got the victim at the time of the victim, and caused the victim to suffer approximately five weeks of treatment, such as inside the left-hand side and the alley.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of E or F;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending punishment] general injury (the range of recommending punishment] is not provided for the mitigation area (two to one year) [special mitigation], and the degree of injury is not provided for in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, but it is not provided for in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act. However, the following circumstances are comprehensively taken into account: (a) there are many criminal records, such as the victim and a majority of criminal records, but there