When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 6, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim for damages (2015 Ghana 3914) with the Cheongju District Court on Cheongcheon District Court around November 6, 2015 from the injured party on the ground that the Defendant committed an act of communication with the wife of the victim C.

On February 18, 2016, the above court rendered a judgment that "the defendant shall pay the victim KRW 20,000,000 to the victim".

On April 18, 2016, the Defendant came to know of the existence of the claim by the injured party by perusal and duplication of the records of the lawsuit claiming compensation for damages, etc., and attempted to falsely transfer the automobile owned by the Defendant to E with the intent of evading compulsory execution. On April 20, 2016, upon obtaining consent from E, the Defendant submitted a certificate of transfer, etc., which caused the sale of the said automobile, to the passage of the Cheongcheon-dong, Cheongcheon-dong, Cheongcheon-si, Cheongcheon-do, for the purpose of evading compulsory execution, and transferred the name of the owner.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred property to the defendant for the purpose of evading compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Court rulings;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Documents printed out of the search of Na case (the defendant and his defense counsel can not recognize the existence of a claim against the defendant by the victim, so the crime of escape from compulsory execution is not established.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the above evidence, at the time of the transfer of the D-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-W-Wn-Wn-Wn-W-Wn-Wn-W-Wn-Wn to E, the Defendant had already filed a lawsuit against the Defendant to seek damages against the Defendant and the judgment became final and conclusive, and the Defendant was also aware of this. The Defendant subsequently filed a supplementary appeal against the above judgment, and the appellate court determined that “the Defendant would pay KRW 5,00,000 to the victim” was final and conclusive.

Therefore, it is against the defendant of the victim.