However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 3. 4. 03:55경 광주 광산구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 식당 안에서, 피고인과 함께 술을 마시던 E이 행패를 부린다는 신고를 받고 출동한 광주광산경찰서 F지구대 소속 경위 G이 위 E의 인적사항을 파악하려고 한다는 이유로 위 G에게 “내가 누군지 알아. 내가 네 위에 있어. 내가 북한에서 상사했던 사람이야. 뭘 알려고 그래 새끼야. 짭새 새끼야. 계급장 떼고 일대일로 만나자. 죽여 버린다. 새끼야.”라고 하면서 손으로 위 G의 가슴을 3~4회 밀치고 멱살을 잡아 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' reports and suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the scope of mitigation area (one month or eight months), mitigation area (special mitigation person] [decision of sentence] assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, the defendant has no record of being punished for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the degree of assault in this case is relatively minor, the defendant's health is not good, and all kinds of sentencing factors such as the defendant's age, character, behavior, environment, etc. shall be determined as per the order.