However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From October 2017, while maintaining a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (the age of 51) from around October 2017, the Defendant was dismissed in C as the victim came to be hedging around September 16, 2019 while the victim worked as the site warden of C who is the representative director.

1. On October 4, 2019, around October 4, 2019, the Defendant destroyed property by fasting the locks owned by the victim, which are attached to the entrance door of a container office, at the site of the stable construction in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the victim managed.

2. Crimes committed on October 26, 2019;

A. On October 26, 2019, at around 13:45 on October 26, 2019, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, who was arguing of a business problem with the victim by means of a mobile phone, by taking the victim’s head debt with his/her hand, and taking the victim’s face, hair, hair, appearance, part of arms, etc. several times due to his/her appearance, and her escape from the victim’s side side 20-day medical treatment.

B. The Defendant: (a) inflicted an injury on the victim at the above time, at the above time, at the above time, and at the above place, and then, (b) caused the victim to death, and (c) caused the victim to die at no more than once, and (d) at no more than once, the death was discarded; (b) the victim was dead; (c) the victim was dead; (d) the victim was dead; (e) the victim was dead at the container office located at the above construction site; and (e) the victim was led to the victim; and (e) the victim was led the victim to the container office at the above construction site; and (e) the victim was dead of the driver’s death. At this time, it shall be rounded off. At once, the death is discarded. In other words, the victim’s death shall be deemed to be discarded only once, and the victim was frighted, and the victim was not able to use the victim’s statement to the Corporation and the Corporation, and the victim was not able to use it for each construction site.