beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.09.10 2020고단442 (1)

산업안전보건법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The defendant shall be ordered to pay an amount equivalent to the above fine by provisional payment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Criminal facts are somewhat revised and recognized to the extent that the identity of facts charged is recognized and the exercise of the defendant's right to defense is not impeded.

Defendant

A A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) is a business owner who is located in Pyeongtaek-si B and has been established for the purpose of painting construction business, etc., and receives from the C Co., Ltd. the “Saeong-si D Co., Ltd. Easung Factory Extension Work” for the cost of construction KRW 38 million around November 1, 2018.

G is a field safety manager of the defendant's above extension work site.

C A Co., Ltd. is a business owner who is located in Ansan City F and is established for the purpose of building construction business, etc., and receives from E the “Sasung Factory Extension Corporation” in the amount of construction cost of KRW 1.31 billion from E around September 1, 2018.

H is the head of the site of the C&A, who is in charge of safety management of the contractor's workers as well as its employees at the construction site.

1. At around 15:00 on December 28, 2018, G and H instructed the victim I (ma, 56 years of age) to work for steel-frame steel-resistant steel-resistant scraping in the third floor laboratory located in Easung-si, Easung-si, Inc., Ltd., Easung-si, A, at the same time.

When an employee boards a mobile vision and engages in painting work, he/she shall install the highest safety gap at the top part to prevent the fall of the employee, and has a duty of care to manage and supervise the safety cap properly.

Nevertheless, at around 15:40 on December 28, 2018, G and H confirmed that the victim exceeded the safety appearance on the grounds that the victim was heated and heated in the safety appearance, and neglected it as it is. In addition, the victim's failure to install the safety distance in the non-system, which caused the victim to move from the mobile non-system, thereby falling down with approximately 1.5 meters away from the floor below vain.