A. Defendant B is a specialist in sexual surgery who operates the Fsung surgery (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Councilor”) in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Defendant C and D are employed by Defendant B and have a doctor to gather a co-sexual surgery against the Plaintiff.

나. 원고는 2012. 6.경 피고 의원에서 코 끝의 모양을 조금 덜 뭉툭하게 바꾸는 내용의 코 성형수술(이하 ‘1차 수술’이라고 한다)을 받았으나, 수술 이후 별다른 개선이 없어 2014. 1. 21. 피고 의원에서 피고 C, D의 집도 하에 재수술 이하 '이 사건 재수술'이라고 한다

(C) The Plaintiff received the instant re-operation. (c) After the instant re-operation, the instant re-operation took place on January 30, 2014, the re-explosion was removed on the part of the surgery, and the re-explosion took place on January 30, 2014, and the re-explosion took place on the part of the skin’s tyption, and the Plaintiff continued to suffer from constant oxygen therapy, and even up to now, the Plaintiff left a permanent chest due to the Plaintiff’s coconplosion and ties, and the local transplant, stem cell transplantation, chest removal surgery, etc. (based on recognition) was in need of dispute. [The grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (each and images included in the family serial number, the result of the medical record appraisal for the Samsung Seoul Hospital Head, the result of physical entrustment to the head of the instant Samsung National University Hospital Hospital,

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Under the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff’s co-owned condition has deteriorated after the re-operation of this case due to the following tort, and the Defendants jointly have a duty to pay the Plaintiff the future medical expenses and consolation money with compensation for damages.

1) In the course of the instant re-operation in violation of the duty of care, Defendant C and D cut the internal blood transfusions to reduce the end of the co, thereby causing the typology and the establishment of the skin and the reflectors. 2) The Defendants violating the duty of explanation will be in a situation where they performed the surgery to the Plaintiff.