beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단3953

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The entry was made in the order of time, not in the order of the case number.

The Defendant, around October 2014, at the D hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 2014, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 5457,” referred the victim E to the same effect as the victim, by making a phone call once every three months to meet the victim and making a phone call once every two to three days. The Defendant, “The father is engaged in Cheong-si retailing in Seoul, but it is possible to obtain a large amount of profit if it is sold at a large amount of money by importing sphofa and other plant products overseas.” The amount of 100 million won investment is to be returned to the principal.

However, the defendant was never aware of the foreign countries and enterprises that produce safafaf, and there was no plan to import safafs.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 100 million from the victim to the single bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant on December 10, 2015, and received KRW 50 million from the victim on January 15, 2016, respectively, to receive KRW 50 million from the victim on December 15, 2016.

around February 2015, the Defendant “2016 Highest 3953,” at H restaurants located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and the victim I, “C is retired from the future and will enter his father company (J) and work for him, and if he makes an investment once every two months, he will pay the proceeds of 15-50% of the principal of the investment and return it immediately with the principal.

The phrase, "as it is possible to brut only one another, it would be confidential to others."

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to make an investment in the company operated by his father because he was planned to use the money invested by the injured party to buy a number of scamblings for entertainment expenses or women-friendly families.

Around April 3, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received transfer of KRW 10 million from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant to the single bank account in the name of the Defendant.