근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The facts charged are as shown in the attached facts charged (Provided, That this shall apply to the case where the challenged person is a defendant). 2. The above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act (the payment of wages), Article 44 Subparag. 1 and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits (the payment of unpaid wages), Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits, and Article 109 of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the
According to the records, it is recognized that the victims expressed their wish not to punish the Defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted (the victim C around January 21, 2016, and the victim D around February 24, 2016). Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.