해임무효확인
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows.
The decision of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance and addition of the judgment in the second instance as referred to in the following paragraph 2, and it is also quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
B. 1) As to the “1. Basic Facts” in the judgment of the first instance court, the following parts are added to the “1. Basic Facts” in the last paragraph, and the evidence No. 4, which is the relevant evidentiary material, to the [the grounds for recognition].
On January 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the president of the Defendant University to revoke the instant dismissal disposition. On March 26, 2014, the Appeal Committee for Teachers rejected the Plaintiff’s claim to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim by rejecting the Plaintiff’s claim to the effect that “the instant dismissal disposition is defective in the disciplinary procedure, no ground exists, or no disciplinary action is determined,” respectively.
2) Each “Article 65(2)” of the second and fourth parallels 20 and 13 and 19 of the first instance trial is each “Article 65(3),” the “Article 4” of the sixth parallels 3 is “Article 65(4),” the “Article 17 of the 8th parallels 17 is “21,143,404 won,” the “Class 9 through 11” of the 10th parallels 10 is “Class 9 through 11 (including branch numbers),” “13,745,45 won” of the 11th parallels 15, and “L” of the 12th parallels 5 are “L”, “13,745,45,” “the first place of the first instance court,” “the first place of the first instance court,” “the first place of the first instance court,” “the first place of the first instance court,” “the first place of the first instance court,” and “the first place of the first instance court examination center”).
3) The first instance court’s Decision No. 14 subparag. 4 deleted the “O account” (hereinafter “O account”). 4) Following the first instance court’s Decision No. 15, the Defendant University President’s “in comprehensive,” added the “in the instant dismissal disposition.”
2. Additional determination is made at the trial of the Plaintiff.