2. The Defendant did not have the record of being punished for the same kind of case, and did not commit the crime of this case in depth, and did not repeat again.

The defendant's vehicles are covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the victims of the traffic accident in this case are relatively minor due to the victims' injuries such as 2 weeks or the treatment period.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspended execution due to the instant case.

The Defendant's blood alcohol concentration was high by 0.124%, the Defendant received a signal-based taxi and caused a string-in-fluoring drilling incident where the taxi conflict with the front line of the taxi due to its shock, and the victim was 7 people to commit the crime.

The defendant did not agree with some victims to the trial.

In addition, considering all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant, the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.