For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendant A on the ground that there was no proof of the relevant crime regarding the violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act regarding the fact that Defendant A’s occupational and practical intention among the instant facts charged and the Defendants did not attach a rated load, etc. among the instant facts charged against the Defendants.

In light of the records, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the possibility of expectation in the occupational and practical crime and the violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no evidence of objection to the remainder of the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.