폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants (e.g., e., e., g., 700,000 won for each of the defendants) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. The fact that Defendant B was punished by a fine for a similar crime; Defendant C had the record of being punished for a similar crime; Defendant C committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, etc. However, in full view of various circumstances, including the place and time when the Defendants invaded, the place and time when the Defendants invaded, the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, the environment, the circumstances leading to the commission of the instant crime, and the method and method of the crime, etc., which are the conditions for the pleadings and the sentencing indicated in the records of the instant case, it cannot be deemed that it is too unreasonable to the extent that the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants should be reversed. Accordingly, the Prosecutor’s assertion is rejected.
3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.