2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the following: (a) the Defendant reflects his mistake in depth; (b) the victim’s damage appears to have been recovered; and (c) the Defendant’s family members appear to have a ties between family members, such as the Defendant’s desire to take the Defendant’s wife.

On the other hand, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration is very high at the time of each crime of this case, the defendant was punished by a fine due to a drunk driving, the defendant's repeated driving without being aware of it even though he was under investigation after he was under the influence of drunk driving, and the occurrence of a traffic accident due to a drunk driving is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc. and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, there is no change of circumstances that can determine different from the original judgment and the punishment, and considering the fact that the court below rendered the lowest sentence of statutory punishment, it cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.