However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From February 27, 2007, the Defendant-friendly B entered into a check contract with Jeju Bank Sung-si and entered into a check check, and entered into a check check, and the Defendant borrowed the face value and the date of issuance from B and used the check with permission from B to fill the number of units in blank.

On January 4, 2013, the Defendant issued 30,00,000 won in the face value column of one sheet of blank units ( check number F) delivered from the above B at the EM General Co., Ltd. at Jeju-si, and one sheet of the number of units per B on the date of issuance on July 10, 2013. The Defendant issued one sheet of the number of units per B to the said bank on July 17, 2013, which is within the period for the presentation of payment. However, the Defendant offered payment to the said bank on July 17, 2013, which is the period for the presentation of payment, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written accusation (Case Number 2013-4535);

1. Application of G’s written statement (Evidence No. 17) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The amount of the check which has not been paid the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not specified, and the same previous records are recorded, and the details of the check are considered.