임대차계약무효확인의소
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
In the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff filed a claim for the remainder of rental deposit with the principal lawsuit, and the defendant filed a claim for damages with the counterclaim, and the court of first instance dismissed both the plaintiff's principal claim and the defendant's counterclaim.
Since only the defendant appealed against this, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for damages, which is the counterclaim of the defendant.
Facts of recognition
A. Under the brokerage of C, a licensed real estate agent on May 8, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant enter into a real estate lease agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) with the terms and conditions as follows (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) with respect to the lease of real estate (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”): < Amended by Act No. 1373, May 8, 2015; Act No. 12060, Jun. 16, 2016; Act No. 15554, Jun. 16, 2016; Act No. 13748, Jun. 24, 2016; Act No. 13874, Jun. 16, 2016; Act No. 15684, Jun. 24, 2016; Act No. 15530, Jun. 16, 2018>
1. This article shall be located within the redevelopment zone and shall be relocated even before the expiration of the contract term if the project is implemented;
2. To reinstate the leased object to the lessee when it is damaged;
3. The lessee shall be liable for damages caused by loss or damage caused by the lessee.
4. The lessee has directly left this article. 5. Other matters shall be governed by the Civil Act and the custom.
6. The lessor shall be the lessor's life cycle for papering and lengthing;
section 1.
AB concluded the agreement.
B. On June 2015, the day before the remainder payment was made by the Plaintiff.