When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 4, 2014, from around 07:00 to around 08:55, the Defendant performed concrete typology construction works by re-subcontracting from D, the original contractor, at the site of Goyang-gu Seoul New Construction, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Kuyang-gu, by obtaining a subcontract for new construction, but without receiving KRW 600 million for the construction cost, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s access to the construction site and performing concrete typology construction works by preventing another company from entering the construction site and preventing another company from entering the construction site due to the termination of new typology construction contract. However, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s new typology construction works by force for approximately two hours.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.