2. The sentencing conditions favorable to the Defendant are the primary offender who had no record of criminal punishment prior to the instant crime, and is against the recognition of the instant crime, etc.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, the act of arranging sexual traffic is detrimental to the sound sexual culture and good morals of a woman by commercializing the sex of a woman, which has a great social hazard, and the equity in sentencing with similar cases, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s allegation of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.