except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

However, on November 17, 2014, the Defendant provided a motor vehicle for commercial transport at a total of seven times from the above date to November 25, 2014, such as: (a) around 17:36 on November 17, 2014, the Defendant provided a motor vehicle for commercial transport on seven occasions in total from the above date to November 25, 2014, for the purpose of transporting a motor vehicle, such as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a charge (including attached documents);

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, the selection of a punishment, and Articles 90 subparagraph 8 and 81 of the Passenger Transport Service Act, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence continues to commit a crime even though he/she had been sentenced to a fine on more than seven occasions due to the same type of crime, the necessity of strict punishment is required. However, considering the fact that there is no room for considering the circumstances, such as the fact that there is no room for considering the fact that the defendant’s reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is one time of suspension of indictment and that he/she continues to commit a crime