except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On May 10, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Central District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 21:30 on May 11, 2020, the Defendant driven D Kaman car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.077% on the front side of C, which is located in B, at a leisure time.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, and summary order-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (wholly amended by Act No. 17371, Jun. 9, 2020); the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant case; (b) the Defendant’s attitude and attitude; (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, the distance of drunk driving; and (d) all the factors of sentencing specified in the trial process of the instant case, including the circumstances after the instant crime.