정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On December 21, 2017, the Defendant sent the document to the Gangnam-gu Office under the title of “the case of reply to “the identification of the matters of a civil petition and the request for submission of opinions” at an infinite place,” and the Defendant was under the control of the Gangnam-gu Office, despite the fact that the victim B and C did not commit any act, such as confinement, assault, etc. of the victim B and C, the Defendant was under the control of threatening-gu Office in order to make the victims implement the document in a way of violence and infinite, which is not related to the question of Gangnam-gu Office’s Gangnam-gu Office.
(2) At around September 21, 2017, C and B visited the victim D director’s home without permission, and held the first race “DB,” but (Omission) they were able to see her unity, “I am hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp hy, etc.
Then, around December 29, 2017, the Defendant directed the members of the Buddhist association, posted the above contents to F of the Seoul redevelopment and reconstruction clean business system website.
Accordingly, the defendant slanders the defendant.