도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Criminal facts
[criminal history] On October 1, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daegu District Court of the Daegu District, and on October 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving), and on November 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving). On November 14, 2014, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two or more years for imprisonment for the same crime.
[2017 Highest 100] On February 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a Clatera car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.135% in the section of about 3km from the front of the Domal waters office located in the Dom of the territorial waters at permanent residence on February 21, 2017 to the front road of the same Ri.
[2017 Highest 187] On March 12, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 21:57, 0.081% of alcohol concentration in blood, was driven by a permanent resident from the front of the 257 Southern Elementary School to the front of the 175 office of the 175 office of the 175 office.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. Reports on internal investigation (statements, etc. by reporters);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes confirming criminal records;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the following sentencing grounds): The defendant is erroneous, and the defendant is against himself/herself, and he/she does not drive drinking again.
There are many things.
B. The Defendant disposed of the said car.
Unfavorable circumstances: The Defendant is driving under drinking several times as stated in the first head of the crime in the judgment.