The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding that the court below convicted all of the facts charged of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint attack), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault), and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint intimidation), and violation of the Punishment of Unindicted 1, 2000, and violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or there is no error in the misapprehension

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.