At around 15:53 on July 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen four items, including 14,90 won per each market price) and 1 lub frame (21,800 won per 14,90 won per 1 market price), using the gap in the management of the above victim C within the Rabic acid where the victim C located in Ulsan-gu B works as the head of the safety office; (b) was stolen by means of hiding the sum of four items, including 66,500 won per 1 market price, and 1 lub frame (21,800 won per 21,80 won per 1 market price).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation and reporting on attaching photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, the sentence against the defendant shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of crime, the damage is minor, the defendant is treated as the impulse disorder, and other various conditions of sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc.