beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.07.16 2012고단4512

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Godan4512] On August 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 on August 24, 2012, the victim F in front of the victim F's house located in Suwon-gu, Busan, the Defendant attempted to lease the vehicle to the victim F in the margin because: (b) there are vehicles with our father operating a siren company; and (c) there are too many vehicles left out of the vehicle; (d) the Defendant would lease the vehicle for a long term of one year for one year.

However, the facts are that the father of the defendant did not operate a siren company, and the vehicle that the defendant was driving the siren to the victim was not paid the sirens from another siren company, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to rent the sirens for a long period of one year to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received money from the victims as vehicle sirens for five times from the time to September 29, 2012, including the amount of KRW 1 million on August 24, 2012, KRW 2400,000 on August 25, 2012, KRW 200,000 on August 30, 2012, KRW 1650,000 on September 6, 2012, and KRW 170,000 on September 19, 2012.

[2013 Highest 419]

1. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A child in his/her country operates a siren company, and he/she works in his/her company, and may in his/her inside and in his/her country and may enjoy sirens at a low cost.” On the face of his/her week, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A child in his/her country operates a siren company,” the Defendant would rent 5 vehicles on a long-term basis for one year.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have worked for a siren company, and the vehicle that the victim was driving a siren to the victim is a vehicle that the defendant did not pay the sirens after having given another siren company a siren, and the defendant has an intention or ability to rent the said sirens for a long period of one year to the victim.