If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Around 03:10 on April 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) observed the scene where the Defendant and the Defendant are working; and (b) prevented the victim E, F, G, and H, a police officer affiliated with the Mapo Police Station D police box called up after receiving a report on the occurrence of the assault case in front of the “Cnoosa” located in F, G, and H; and (c) reported to the victim at the same place where the Defendant and three of the Defendant’s daily activities on the said Mana I and name in which many unspecified persons pass, “I Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y,” and “I Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Each statement of E, F, and I;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint filed by E, F, G, and H;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the amount of fine shall be determined in consideration of the selection of fines, the fact that crimes are recognized, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, etc.);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;