소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the admitting this case by the court of first instance are as follows: evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7, and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance to the effect that "Evidence No. 1, 3, 7, and 9 of the evidence No. 9", evidence No. 10, evidence No. 11-1, 2 (Evidence No. 19-1, 2 of the evidence No. 19-1, 12, evidence No. 14-1, evidence No. 15 (Evidence No. 8 of the same Article), evidence No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance to the effect that "Evidence No. 1, 3, 7, and 9 of the judgment No. 1, evidence No. 17, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 9-1, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 9-1, evidence No. 9-1, evidence No. 2, and evidence No. 1, No. 9-1, evidence No. 7 evidence No. 1, and No. 2 of the evidence No. 9 of the judgment
In other words, most of the above evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is merely the statement of the Plaintiff as a final source. According to the evidence Eul evidence No. 4, it is recognized that O sent to AG a content certification to the effect that the G land in this case is personal ownership on March 18, 2009. The facts acknowledged in the civil case already established in the civil trial are valuable evidence, barring any special circumstance, and it cannot be rejected without a reasonable explanation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2009Da38612, May 13, 2010; 2012Da4471, Nov. 29, 2012). According to the evidence No. 12-4 of the evidence No. 12-4, the Plaintiff’s assertion appears to be contrary to the Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Na2311, May 19, 2019.