2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case is not good, the defendant committed again during the period of repeated crime even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and the sentencing balance with the same crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, considering various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.