beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.10.17 2014고단1011

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The description of the defendant in the attached criminal facts of this case is as follows.

2. Of the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act, which is a joint penal provision, with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article." The decision of unconstitutionality was rendered by the Constitutional Court that the provision of the same Act is in violation of the Constitution over two occasions, and accordingly, the provision of

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.