If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant entered on November 2, 2009 while operating the D Co., Ltd. under subparagraph 205 of the Daejeon Dong-gu Seoul Building, and resigned on September 30, 2010, but entered the name, resident registration number, address, etc. of E in the “career certificate” stored in the D’s computer document preparation program to be exercised at the D office on November 201, 201, and submitted the portion of the E’s name and seal to the employees of the affiliated company column, “D”, “A”, and “A” in the technical career column, “the head office of civil engineering work from November 2, 2009 to August 28, 201,” and “the date on which the document was prepared and sealed to the Association’s name and seal attached thereto without the authority of each Association.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the written accusation and petition;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the same criminal record and reflects the sentencing grounds of the provisional payment order. However, the defendant was issued from the H Association five times a “certificate of the possession of construction engineer” under the premise that he had worked for the period during which he did not work for the D Co., Ltd., and considering the fact that the defendant appears to have committed a crime for his own interest, the amount of fine for the summary order is appropriate.