A. The lower court’s sentencing against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing against Defendant A of the Prosecutor is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering that the nature of the instant crime is not good, and that the Defendants committed the instant crime even before the same criminal record, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendants.

However, considering the following facts: (a) the Defendants divided their mistakes; (b) the Defendants did not have any previous conviction exceeding the fine; (c) the degree of the Defendants’ participation in the instant crime; and (d) the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct and environment; (b) motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (d) the Defendants and the prosecutor’s aforementioned arguments are too heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendants and the

3. As such, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.