Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The crime of this case regarding the defendant's wrongful assertion of sentencing was committed by the defendant using 43 times the victim's glass window, removed the victim's property or attempted to steal or steal the victim's property, operated a motor vehicle four times without the driver's license, promising the victim to return the victim's access to the vehicle, and the nature of the crime is very bad. The defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment for the larceny of the same kind of law (7 times of imprisonment), even though he had already been released from the court, and even if he had been sentenced to criminal punishment for the larceny of the same kind of law on several occasions, the crime of larceny has been repeatedly committed several times on several occasions, and the total amount of the damage amount reaches 1,764,00 won, and the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of this case were comprehensively taken into account. In full view of all the factors of sentencing, the defendant's entire confession and reflects the victim's property among various factors of sentencing, and the victim's name and discretion have been too favorable to the defendant.