If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 17, 2013, at around 02:50 on May 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) patroled the said place at the time, such as taxi engineers D without paying a taxi fee; and (b) was solicited by the police officer of the Seoul Eastdong Police Station, who heard the damage statement from the said D, to return home from E, and (c) took the bath of the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, and the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch son.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each statute on witness E, D, and F to each legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) shall be determined as the same as the order in consideration of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case in contingency under the influence of alcohol and the fact that the degree of assault is insignificant in light of the victim'