If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B k7 car.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 13:00, and 2nd 70-1 of Southyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant was forced to make a right-hand turn to the middle schoolside of the upper shot-si, the upper shot-si, the upper shot-si.

Since there is a delivery in front of it, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely by safely driving the steering gear and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected his duty at the front of the front bank, and due to the negligence of proceeding, the Defendant received C(56 years, women) and D(22 years, women) from the right side to the left side of the front part of the Defendant’s car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C by the occupational negligence as above, such as the alley at the lower end of the 10 week frame in need of medical treatment, and the leap wing salt at the lower end of the bar, and the victim D suffered injury, such as the left-hand field, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Rotten CCTV photographing photographs;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written diagnosis and each additional written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The victims suffered great injuries for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, due to the Defendant’s traffic accident crime of this case.

The victims are still trying to punish the defendant.

However, the defendant has so far.