However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 22, 2014, at around 23:35, the Defendant was urged to return home from E in the front of the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu “Cju store” located in the Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and was urged to return home from E in the circumstances belonging to the D District of the Incheon Seo-gu Police Station D District. The Defendant stated that “I wanted to take much time at the place of business, live equally, ageed, Chewing, and Chewing,” and that I pushed the chest of the above E on the hand floor with the hand, and continuously tight F of the Gyeong-gu, Incheon. The Defendant expressed that “I will sick back, cut off, and walked the above F’s right side side.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 on-site visit by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point in conflict with one another);

1. Order of community service: Sentencing criteria for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties and six to one year and four months;