Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On February 29, 2016, the Defendant, in violation of the Automobile Management Act, dismantled a device of maximum speed restriction without permission by having C manipulate a restriction on maximum speed of D Sknife special vehicles on the roads near Gangnam-si B in the Gyeongcheon-si.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, from February 29, 2016 to January 2017, operated the said special motor vehicle, which was defective due to the dismantlement of the highest speed restriction device as described in paragraph (1) from the Japanese branch of Gangseo-si without permission, from around March 29, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. All documents other than the case C

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (related to the payment of expenses for dismantling vehicles speed-restricted devices);

1. Article 79-2 of the relevant Act and Articles 79-2 and 35 of the Automobile Management Act, Article 153 (1) 1 and 40 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of a fine for each offense (the first offense, and the restoration from the original state, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;