[2014 Highest 722: Defendant C, CK, CK, CL, A, CM, CN, and C of the CO (Law No. BR) is a person who was appointed to be widely known from the Republic of Korea as of January 12, 2010 upon the recommendation of the AZ, which is the founder of the Qu company located in Gwangju City, and Defendant A refers to the head of Qu company, who is a person who is appointed by Qu company, and on May 24, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced on August 1, 2013 to be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, which became final and conclusive on August 1, 2013, and Defendant CK is currently a person who is under suspension of the said sentence.

Defendant

C Despite having been appointed as a Chief of Q company as of January 12, 2010, the victim R (legal title CT) dismissed in Q company as of January 11, 2010 did not exercise the authority of Q company as a Chief of Q company on the wind that was denied the legitimacy of the dismissal measure, and does not run away from the public knowledge. On June 28, 2013, the Supreme Court rendered a final decision in favor of R in the litigation to confirm the status of creative owner, and rendered a preliminary decision on July 19, 2013 to suspend R from the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court to suspend the performance of duties as Chief of Q company. However, while R did not take over Q company's possession of Q company, it was necessary to receive a notice of provisional disposition as to Q company's site and land for the public auction around September 25, 2013.

1. Defendant C, K, CK, CL, CM, CN, and CO’s co-criminal conduct (violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, a deadly weapons, etc., and a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (a collective weapon, etc.)))). Defendant C, together with Defendant C, discussed the measures and measures at “CV” restaurant located in the CU at the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, and forced Qu company to stop the above public sale. Defendant C knew of the fact that Qu company was driven by Qu company and forced Q company.