When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CEX vehicles.

On October 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 07:25 on October 18, 2014, and proceeded at the speed of Si/Sacheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Seoul, with a wooden-doic air protection.

Since there is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left due to the negligence in violation of the signal and brought the front part of the driver's seat of the victim D(55 years of age) driven by the victim D(55 years of age) who was proceeding in accordance with the new care on the surface of the bottled 25 years of age to the left.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the foregoing occupational negligence, corrected the injury to the passengers of the damaged vehicle, who need approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment due to the cherical and chalkal base, etc. in light of the background and chalphical trend, as seen above, the “M” in the facts charged of L appears to be the clerical error of “L”.

(Y) Noting 58 years of age, he suffered injury in need of medical treatment for about three weeks due to the cryp and the salt pan of the cryp.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Each description of each written diagnosis;

1. The current status of an on-site map and a bus in transit;

1. Application of statutes on images of on-site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant has reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment. The defendant shall be married and female who intend to take an occasional examination of occasional transfer of university.