양수금
1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
2...
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the defense prior to the merits are as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment prior to the merits is the same as that of Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the "Article 7" of the second 8 and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be "Article 6," and the "No. 7" of the first 17 is deemed to be "No. 7, 8, and No. 9."
2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the decision on the merits in this case are stated in the judgment of the court of the first instance.
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 2, except for the following modifications, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
【Supplementary Use】
B. Determination 1) A is a licensed real estate agent operating the F Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and the Plaintiff is his/her brokerage assistant.
B) On March 25, 2013, J Co., Ltd., the representative of which is C, is L Co., Ltd., the representative director of which is H on March 25, 2013 (hereinafter “J Co., Ltd.”).
On September 6, 2013, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Housing Corporation”) issued an occasional purchase announcement to the effect that the housing corporation purchases 850 units, such as multi-family houses located in Daejeon Metropolitan City, etc. in order to provide low-income groups with housing in the downtown (hereinafter “instant announcement”) on September 6, 2013 (hereinafter “instant public announcement”). The instant public announcement includes the fact that the housing corporation purchases housing units through a real estate brokerage office, it shall pay a statutory brokerage fee (0.4% of the selling price). The instant public announcement also shows that the Plaintiff would allow C to sell the unsold urban residential housing unit, which is unsold in lots, and after obtaining C’s approval, visited K office with G to purchase urban residential housing units. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24775, Sep. 15, 2013>