사기
The part of the judgment of the court below (excluding the dismissed part of the application for compensation order) against Defendant B shall be reversed.
Defendant
B.
1. The lower court rejected the remainder of KRW 4,130,093, citing part of KRW 10,000 among the application for compensation order against the Defendants by C, an applicant for compensation.
An applicant for compensation cannot file an objection against a judgment dismissing an application for compensation order pursuant to Article 32 (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and the foregoing dismissed portion shall be excluded from the scope of the adjudication of this
2. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A (1) misunderstanding of facts did not play a role in recruiting and managing the members of the Bosing Organization in the Republic of Korea, and there was no fact that there was a contestation of such a role. The Defendant only offered AV a kind of G, H’s part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part of the part-time part-time part-time part-time part of the part-time part-time part-time part-time part of
B. The lower court’s imprisonment (two years and six months of imprisonment) against Defendant B is too unreasonable.
3. Determination on the grounds for appeal
가. 피고인 A의 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 피고인 A는 원심에서도 이 부분 항소이유와 동일한 취지로 주장하였으나, 원심은 그 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사실 내지 사정, 즉 피고인은 G과 H으로 하여금 한국에서 잘 사용되지 않는 중국 메신저 프로그램(QQ)을 휴대전화에 설치하게 하고 중국 보이스피싱 조직원들의 아이디를 가르쳐 준 점, 피고인은 G, H에게 ‘걸리지 않고 잘 하라’, ‘경찰에게 잡히면 그냥 신문지 구인광고 보고 전화해서 시작하게 됐다고 하라’라고 말하였던 점, 많은 돈을 배달하는 것을 이상하게 여긴 G이 피고인에게 괜찮은 것인지 묻자 피고인이 ‘신경 안 써도 된다’고 답하였던 점 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인 A가 보이스피싱 범행에 관련된 일임을...