except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Telecommunications financial fraud (one-time Bosing) is an organized crime consisting of various stages of organization, such as “total liability” that plans and instructs a total crime, “locks by deceiving and threatening a victim,” “locks by deceiving and threatening a victim,” “locks by soliciting and delivering cash cards, cash accounts, etc.”, “locks by withdrawing or directly receiving the money transferred by the victims from the cash payment date,” “locks by receiving cash from the withdrawal date,” “locks by delivering cash to domestic or foreign total books,” and “locks by delivering deposited criminal proceeds”.

On October 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal that “a loan may be made; (b) a loan will not be made with bank transaction records; (c) a Bitcoin transaction will be made; (d) a Bitcoin transaction will be made; and (e) if an account is known, a bank will be deposited in the Defendant’s account; and (e) a loan will be made if an account is communicated, and (e) a bank account will be given to a company holding virtual currency; and (e) the fact that the proposal was known that it was possible to commit a scaming crime, and (e) the Defendant consented to it by accessing the C site, a virtual currency exchange site, and notified the Defendant’s corporate bank account (D) under the name of the Defendant.

On October 22, 2018, the F Bank will provide a loan to the victim E by telephone at a non-place on the name of October 22, 2018.

‘Falsely speaking to the effect that ‘’ was false.

However, in fact, the above inducement policy was not an employee of the FF bank, and only was the intent to commit the Bosing Fraud, and there was no intention or ability to normally provide the loan to the victim.

The above-mentioned incentive for the name of the victim is deceiving the victim as above.