However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 20:50 on August 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol with her husband D and son E, etc. at the place of “C” located in the East Sea (hereinafter “C”); (b) while drinking alcohol with her husband D and son E at the stage of dancing, the Victim F, E, who is the her husband, was entitled to drinking with her husband; and (c) the Victim F, who is the her husband, was able to drinking with her husband; and (d) the Victim was able to file a claim against the victim by misunderstanding her husband as an entertainment receptionist

Accordingly, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “I am 65 years of age,” and “I am ice,” and expressed the victim’s face side one time by hand, left the victim’s left hand, left the victim’s disease on the table, followed by the victim’s left hand, and left the victim’s knife of glass material, which is a dangerous object on the table.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral cerebrovas, which does not have two or more situations in which treatment is required for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant interfered with business, at the main point of “C” operated by the Victim G (A) at the time and time indicated in the above paragraph (1) above, avoided disturbance by taking a bath against F, taking a brush and crupting a beer, etc., and the victim followed the Defendant from the Defendant’s side, stating that the victim “I am less than 40 minutes old.” As such, other customers, who did drinking alcohol from the main point of view, let the Defendant out of the outside.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

3. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property at the time, place, as described in the above paragraph (1), laid one clouse of glass material equivalent to 1,000 won in the market price owned by the victim G, the principal store operator, as above.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement concerning G and F.