However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 02:00 on February 21, 2018, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance by inserting the door in front of the supervisor office of the OOO-research institute located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul at around 02:0; (c) opened the entrance by putting the door in front of the supervisor of the 4th floor of the DOO-research institute located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (d) invaded the victim’s gate up to the front of the e’s book; and (d) stolen the victim’s 1.5 million won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.

2. On March 15, 2018, at night, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance in front of the five-story office of the non-permanent office located in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul at around 01:00 on March 15, 2018; (b) intruded the front of the five-story office of the victim F; and (c) used a stamp 21 unit when the market price of the victim, which is the victim’s ownership, was in excess of the gallon road.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.

3. On March 18, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny at night, on or around March 18, 2018, at night, the Defendant: (a) opened an entrance door to connect the said office to the office, opened it, and invaded into the office, and attempted to commit it with the wind that is discovered by the night workers during the search of stolen objects. (b) On March 18, 2018, the Defendant: (c) was in front of the office of Non-Party D and Non-Party 4 OO companies located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (d) was in front of the office of Non-Party 4 O companies located in the said office.

Thus, the defendant had invaded on a structure at night and attempted to steals property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to E, G, and H;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 330 and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense [Selection of Imprisonment]

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant of this case is at night over three times.